Between two houses
A child carries messages
Of a silent war
There's a particular kind of warfare that happens after divorce—a cold war fought through children. Like nations using smaller countries as proxy battlefields, divorced parents sometimes use their children to continue battles they can't fight directly anymore. The marriage may be over, but the war continues, with children becoming the territory both sides fight to control.
The child becomes a pawn in a game they never agreed to play. Every custody exchange becomes a border crossing, every holiday a negotiated settlement, every childhood milestone a strategic victory for one parent and a defeat for the other. While other children worry about homework and friendships, these young diplomats learn to navigate emotional minefields and manage adult conflicts.
Like superpowers vying for influence in a buffer state, each parent works to secure the child's loyalty. The weapons are subtle: extra gifts, looser rules, exciting adventures on one side; consistency, structure, and "tough love" on the other. The child learns to navigate both territories, adapting their personality and preferences depending on which border they've crossed.
"Your mother lets you eat that? Well, in this house we have rules."
These aren't just differences in parenting styles—they're strategic moves in a larger conflict. The parent isn't just setting rules; they're drawing a line in the sand, defining their territory in opposition to the other parent's domain. The child becomes a living referendum on which parenting approach is "better."
Children become intelligence assets in this domestic cold war. Each parent pumps them for information about the other's life: "Is your dad dating anyone?" "What did your mom buy with the child support money?" "Does she still drink that much wine?"
The child becomes a reluctant spy, carrying secrets across enemy lines. They learn to edit, omit, and sometimes outright lie to maintain the fragile peace. The truth becomes a dangerous commodity that might trigger another round of hostilities. This position forces children to develop premature diplomatic skills, learning what information to share and what to withhold to keep the peace.
Like civilians caught in an actual war zone, children in these situations develop sophisticated survival skills. They become expert negotiators, emotional cartographers mapping unstable terrain, and conflict mediators between the adults who should be protecting them.
But the cost is their childhood innocence. The mental energy that should be devoted to learning, playing, and forming their own identity gets redirected toward managing adult emotions and navigating parental conflicts. They carry burdens that should never belong to a child, becoming miniature adults before their time.
"Just tell your father that if he really loved you, he'd pay for your braces."
The child becomes the messenger, the negotiator, the emotional hostage in a conflict they didn't start and can't end. Each parental demand places them in an impossible position—forced to choose between loyalty to one parent and honesty with the other.
What makes these proxy wars particularly devastating is their endless nature. Actual wars eventually end with treaties or surrender. But parental conflicts can simmer for decades, flaring up at graduations, weddings, even grandchildren's birthdays.
The battlefield just keeps expanding. Now it's not just about custody—it's about which parent gets acknowledged in the graduation speech, who sits where at the wedding, which grandparents get more time with the grandchildren. The conflict evolves but never truly resolves, with new fronts opening as the child grows into adulthood.
Healing begins when the child—now often an adult—declares themselves neutral territory. It requires the difficult work of setting boundaries, refusing to carry messages, and insisting on being treated as a person rather than a prize in someone else's war.
Some learn to establish diplomatic relations with both parents while maintaining their own sovereignty. Others have to withdraw from one or both battle zones entirely for their own peace. This declaration of independence often comes at great emotional cost, as it may mean disappointing one or both parents.
The most hopeful outcome is when parents eventually realize they've been fighting over ruins—that in their battle to win, they've damaged what they were fighting for. But like actual geopolitical conflicts, these realizations often come too late, after the damage is done and the child has already paid the price.
Those who grew up as proxy battlefields often develop a profound awareness of the damage such conflicts cause. Many become determined to break the cycle, either by choosing different partners, developing healthier conflict resolution skills, or making conscious decisions to protect their own children from similar dynamics.
The work of healing involves recognizing that the conflict was never about the child, even though it was fought through them. It requires separating one's identity from the parental battle and understanding that love shouldn't come with conditions or require choosing sides.
Perhaps the greatest act of rebellion is learning to hold both parents in one's heart without feeling disloyal to either—to recognize that human complexity allows for loving flawed people without endorsing their harmful behaviors.
On Family Conflict and Healing
This essay uses geopolitical analogies to describe family dynamics that many children of divorce will recognize. While not all divorced parents engage in these patterns, those who do create lasting emotional consequences.
Healing from being a proxy in parental conflicts involves setting boundaries, developing emotional independence, and recognizing that the conflict belonged to the adults, not the child. The hope is that by naming these patterns, we can better understand and heal from them.